> From: Keith Marshall <keith****@users*****> > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:22:52 +0000 > > > No, __USE_MINGW_FSEEK is indeed not relevant to MinGW64. The problem > > is specific to MinGW. But the solution, to define _WIN32_WINDOWS, > > might create a problem for MinGW64. > > Why would it? It's not relevant for them, so why would they do anything > other than completely ignore it? I don't know, but their headers include a few hits for _WIN32_WINDOWS.
Fork