[Mingw-users] alloca() and S_ISSOCK()

Back to archive index

Keith Marshall keith****@users*****
Sun Mar 4 03:44:56 JST 2018


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/03/18 19:54, Anton Shepelev wrote:
> From my point of view, it is better to support alloca() the GNU
> way, as it will help me compile more *nix programs with less
> problems. But I understand that it may not be the goal of MinGW.

It isn't a priority, but see:
https://osdn.net//projects/mingw/ticket/37995

- -- 
Regards,
Keith.

Public key available from keys.gnupg.net
Key fingerprint: C19E C018 1547 DE50 E1D4 8F53 C0AD 36C6 347E 5A3F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJamu0oAAoJEMCtNsY0flo/H08P/2pBM07EEkYDyfxt+Ih5r1VW
VZxIhTietnJ93wZyTNkVO4QRfR4czFrdoX3mLm5FoKQLW802XQzQ9qkyQ7APrHoM
i8p2WSdagoypgeg+QbZSWiIwyrfRAH9G8qZJ+6OdEnJelJ53q7p1FUtI4DRAW58L
1HUaFxnbe7nikV+0bL86uGmW3VzEYf5WpA+pwOZFW1KoXF9Z7YWdsIACMXZsAoS8
uVYxVRD+Qv2Txl34JOjFY8LYiRQbRV1V0GP0o2UlceHMlVvn4UQr2ncdE0AvTuVB
jXVmGxKyH365AzFKsyKlRpTGrjihASrtx1Mfyyga2w5M5RJw5rRIgaOKYSHUCoQ+
d4NaEZ3kVooITD5NpLtoGwmsRTGz+McbyTP9RKXFkY52tDzwv2mqP+r/Xnpjv56r
MVQSfOIV7k0pt+6u/bzMJnUia31qluvKCVXajSR8w6CepZfWUj9tB7g8WWsy90+H
IpsbGCbbtPn/9XOxatxLJ6E/oICDwiJlkzm9BkdoY9qYf/7XyJqh8VOgvwVMaeRo
c6YU0CnOPYE3fzwN8L9aMbQf8Vl9djZ59r96PsGrXNUS5tNhcVl7DQurlpSkCwLC
dm+VXx5w5Usysj3FNxZd77TQyktBAKoRFIFwL8qJRtg/mP3jPvYi7LhZhwl6slKe
9Zj5jY1I7YBvEgImedLd
=V9vP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the MinGW-Users mailing list
Back to archive index